@Dr Oates @Androfill I noted in another thread that your experience taught you that:
1. Most patients were underwhelmed with the result.
2 At leat 5 ml was required to see effect.
3 Necrosis had occurred when greater that 2/3 ml was injected.
Many published studies reported seeing significant effects on intravaginal ejeculation latency time with less than 2ml HA injection. Why don't you think you are seeing something different in the clinic, is it a difference in endpoint? Pub bias?
In what way we're the patients 'underwhelmed'
How common are these necrosis events and what is the normal cause?
1. Most patients were underwhelmed with the result.
2 At leat 5 ml was required to see effect.
3 Necrosis had occurred when greater that 2/3 ml was injected.
Many published studies reported seeing significant effects on intravaginal ejeculation latency time with less than 2ml HA injection. Why don't you think you are seeing something different in the clinic, is it a difference in endpoint? Pub bias?
In what way we're the patients 'underwhelmed'
How common are these necrosis events and what is the normal cause?
Category: General Phalloplasty Discussion